Md. Abdullah v. State Of Bihar and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Confirmed provisional anticipatory bail in a 498A matrimonial dispute. Directed petitioner to pay Rs. 2500/month for one year to the complainant. Commissioned family court maintenance proceedings remain open to the complainant.
What did the court decide?
Provisional anticipatory bail confirmed; directed to pay Rs. 2500/month for one year to the complainant.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4582 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1133 Year-2018 Thana- SIWAN COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSiwan
======================================================
Md. Abdullah, son of Chand Mohamad, Resident of village-Kavalpura, P.S.Mashrakh, District-Saran at Chapra
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
- The State of Bihar
- Shakeela Khatoon, son of Md. Abudullah, Resident of village-Kavalpura P.S.-Mashrakh, District-Saran At Chhapra At present residing at Tole Mishra Ka More P.S.-Bhagwanpur Hat, District-Siwan
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Yashraj Bardhan,Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to confirm the provisional anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner in a 498A complaint case after mediation failed.
What directions regarding financial payment to the complainant should be imposed along with bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Md. Abdullah
- respondent
The State of Bihar
- respondent
Shakeela Khatoon
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court