Allowed

Md. Ishaque v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Jul 2019CR. MISC./9395/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, a Godown In-charge, in an offences under the Essential Commodities Act and Food Adulteration Act, subject to security payment and cooperation with investigation and trial.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail bond of Rs.25,000 with two sureties after paying Rs.1,00,000 security and cooperating with investigation and trial.

Md. Ishaque Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9395 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-499 Year-2018 Thana- BAGHA District- West Champaran

¶3

======================================================

MD. ISHAQUE

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Malay Kumar Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Parmeshwar Mehta ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

5 02-07-2019

¶12

This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Bagaha (Patkhauli) P.S. Case No. 499 of 2018, disclosing offences under Section 7 of Essential Commodities Act, 1981 and Section 16 (1) (A) (ii) of the Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

¶13

Allegation as per the F.I.R. against the petitioner, who happens to be the Godown In-charge of the B.S.F.C. is that on enquiry by the S.D.O. Bagaha, 128 bags of wheat was in excessive and 547 bags of rice was found less and the several bags were found mixed with rice and wheat.

¶14

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that during the search, the wheat and rice fell on the floor and the same were mixed, due to that some shortage has been found and for that he is ready to co-operate with the authority, if he is granted anticipatory bail.

¶15

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the B.S.F.C.,

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9395 of 2019(5) dt.02-07-2019 2/2

¶17

who has opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that in view of the statement made in paragraphs 19 to 21 of the petition, the rice was found in shortage of 421 bags and wheat in excessive of 374 bags.

¶18

In such view of the matter, let the petitioner, above named, surrender and make payment of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh) as a security in the Court, the learned court below shall be released him on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bagaha, West Champaran (Bettiah), in connection with Bagaha (Patkhauli) P.S. Case No. 499 of 2018, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with further condition that he shall cooperate with the investigation and once charge sheet has been submitted also during the trial.

¶19

It is needless to say that the aforesaid amount shall be subject to the result of this case.

¶20

With the aforesaid observations, this application is disposed of.

¶21

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶22

Sunil Shukla/-

¶23

U T

Md. Ishaque v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Ishaque v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukesh Raj @ Santosh Sao Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Manish Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Triloki Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Abdullah Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Ramesh Prasad @ Ramesh Gendalal Prasad Vs the State of Bihar

Sohel Tanvir @ Chhotu and Ors. Vs the State of Bihar