Allowed

Raj Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC2 Jul 2019CR. MISC./66635/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Petitioner filed an application for anticipatory bail regarding allegations under Sections 498A and 341 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The Court directed the Petitioner to surrender, deposit an affidavit promising dignified care, and granted provisional bail for six months contingent on conduct monitoring.

What did the court decide?

The application for anticipatory bail is allowed subject to surrender, an affidavit, and six months provisional bail with conditions.

Raj Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66635 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2017 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Madhepura

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Raj Kumar Yadav, Son of Badry Yadav, Resident of Village-Tarabe P.S.Gamgaria, District-Madhepura.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sir Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶9

4 02-07-2019

¶10

This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Mahila (Madhepura) P.S. Case No. 86 of 2017, disclosing offences under Sections 498A, 341, 324, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶11

Case is under Section 498-A of the IPC with an allegation of demand of Rs.50,000/- and a cow and for that, assaulted the informant and ousted her from the house along with her children.

¶12

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the whole allegation is false and concocted and he is still ready to keep her with full dignity and care.

¶13

On the other hand, the opposite party no.2 has appeared and submitted that she is also ready to reside with the petitioner, if she is allowed to live with full dignity and care.

¶14

In such view of the matter, let the petitioner, above

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66635 of 2018(4) dt.02-07-2019 2/2

¶16

named, surrender before the learned court below on 10.07.2019 and on that day the opposite party no.2 shall also remain present in the Court, and further on filing of an affidavit by the petitioner that he is ready to keep her with full dignity and care and to take her from the Court itself, then he will be released on provisional bail for a period of six months. During that period, the learned court below shall watch the conduct of both the parties and further directs that both the parties shall appear in the second week of each month before the learned court below. Once the court below is satisfied with the conduct of both the parties, and their marital relationship, especially the conduct of the petitioner, the court below either confirm the bail bonds of the petitioner or pass any other orders, which may deem fit and proper, including cancelling the bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶17

With the aforesaid observations, this application is

¶18

allowed.

¶19

Sunil Shukla/-

¶20

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶21

U T

Raj Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raj Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukesh Raj @ Santosh Sao Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Manish Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Triloki Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Abdullah Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Md. Ishaque Vs The State of Bihar

Ramesh Prasad @ Ramesh Gendalal Prasad Vs the State of Bihar