A writ application seeking academic critical action or judicial redress was disposed of as infructuous by an oral order as the petitioner sought permission to withdraw it due to the passage of time.
Application disposed of as infructuous upon permission to withdraw granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16093 of 2014
======================================================
Prof. ( Dr.) Dalvir Singh Chauhan, son of Late Shiv Singh, Resident of Jai Prakash Nagar, Gewal Bigha, Police Station Civil Line, District- Gaya, Pin823001
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Ranjan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manish Kumar, AC to AAG-6
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
to withdraw this writ application, as it has been rendered infructuous, during the passage of time.
The writ application is accordingly disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
Uday/-
U
Prof. (Dr.) Dalvir Singh Chauhan
State of Bihar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
