The High Court at Patna, hearing a writ petition, noted that the petitioner's grievance had been redressed based on the counter affidavit. Consequently, the court disposed of the writ petition as having become infructuous.
The writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16952 of 2014
======================================================
Hari Bansh Jha, son of Late Yoganand Jha, resident of village -Legma, PS Sonbarsa Raj, District Saharsa
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amarnath Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Nivedita Nirvikar, GA 10 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
On perusal of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed.
In that view of the matter, the present writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
mrl./-
U
Hari Bansh Jha
State Of Bihar
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
