Disposed

Pushpa Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC25 Sept 2018CWJC/13774/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Oral order disposing of a writ petition where the Court held that respondent authorities may determine the merits based on a related writ petition within four months, explicitly avoiding any opinion on the case's merits at this stage.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to verify record and decide within four months if petitioner's case resembles CWJC No. 13760 of 2014.

Pushpa Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Education and Admissions | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13774 of 2014

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Pushpa Kumari, Wife of Sri Awadhesh Singh, Resident of VillageKuchaikote, P.S.- Kuchaikote, District- Gopalganj.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Regional Deputy Director, Saran at Chapra.

¶10

The District Magistrate, Gopalganj.

¶11

The District Education Officer, Gopalganj. null null

¶12

The Head Master, Manan Nagina Project Girls High School, Kuchaikote, District- Gopalganj. null null

¶13

null null null

¶14

... ... Respondent/s

¶15

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Srivastava Ms. Rajni Gandha For the Respondent/s : Mr. K.Alok, SC 8 ======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶17

2 25-09-2018 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present case is covered by the decision in CWJC No. 13760 of 2014 disposed of on 19.09.2018.

¶19

If the case of the petitioner is covered by the order passed in CWJC No. 13760 of 2014 the respondents are required to consider and grant the same benefit to the petitioner as the petitioner in the said writ petition. Final decision may be taken by the respondents on the claim of the petitioner in the light of the decision passed in CWJC No. 13760 of 2014 within

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.13774 of 2014(2) dt.25-09-2018 2/2

¶21

a period of four months from today.

¶22

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶23

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion with regard to the merits of the present case. The respondent authorities are required to verify the record of the case and if it is found that the present case and the relief prayed for are similar to that of CWJC No. 13760 of 2014, the benefit will be extended to the petitioner within the stipulated period.

¶24

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶25

mrl./-

¶26

Pushpa Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pushpa Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ishwar Nath Jha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Awes Alam and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sri Ram Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Manoj Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Haribansh Jha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Naazim Uddin Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.