Dismissed

Manoj Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC25 Sept 2018CWJC/17414/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an oral order where the High Court granted permission to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition to file an appeal before the newly functional State Appellate Authority. The writ stood disposed of subject to conditions regarding the appeal filing.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition to file an appeal within one month before the State Appellate Authority.

Manoj Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17414 of 2014

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Manoj Kumar Yadav S/o Saheb Lal Yadav Resident of Village Majgama, Post Office & P.S. Angarrh, District Purnea.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar.

¶7

The District Employment Appellate Authority, Purnea.

¶8

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Purnea.

¶9

The Block Development Officer, Baisa, Purnea.

¶10

The Secretary, Gram Panchayat Chandwar, Police Station Rauta, District Purnea.

¶11

The Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Chandwar, Police Station Rauta, District Purnea.

¶12

Md. Haroon Rashid S/o Moquimuddin Resident of Majgams, P.S. Angarh, District Purnea.

¶13

Shankar Prasad Das S/o Ajay Kumar Das Resident of Village Majgama, P.O. & P.S. Angarh, District Purnea.

¶14

... ... Respondent/s

¶15

======================================================

¶16

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Firoz Ahmad, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Harish Kumar GP-8 ======================================================

¶17

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶18

2 25-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶19

In view of the fact that the State Appellate Authority is now functional, the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition in order to file an appeal before the State Appellate Authority.

¶20

Permission is granted.

¶21

In case the petitioner files an appeal before the State Appellate Authority within a period of one month from today along with a copy of this order, the State Appellate Authority is

¶22

Patna High Court CWJC No.17414 of 2014(2) dt.25-09-2018 2/2

¶23

required to decide the appeal on its own merit after condoning the delay in filing the appeal in view of the fact that the petitioner was pursuing the writ petition for the same relief before this Court.

¶24

With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶25

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶26

spandey/-

¶27

Manoj Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manoj Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ishwar Nath Jha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Awes Alam and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sri Ram Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Pushpa Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Haribansh Jha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Naazim Uddin Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.