Allowed

Pradeep Rajbanshi v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC16 Aug 2018CR. MISC./35009/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Oral order granting bail to the petitioner in a dowry-related case. The court directed the petitioner to furnish a bail bond with two sureties to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya. No specific subject matter for the order was provided in the judgment text. The judgment only grants bail based on the facts presented by the petitioner. The judgment does not discuss any precedent or legal

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-2nd, Gaya.

Pradeep Rajbanshi Vs The State Of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.35009 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-55 Year-2016 Thana- ATRI District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Pradeep Rajbanshi, Son of Karu Rajbanshi, Resident of Village- Sira, P.S.Atri, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rajkishore Singh ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 16-08-2018

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

counsel for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in Atri P.S. Case No. 55 of 2016 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304(B), 201, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Informant is the father of the deceased who in his written complaint has stated that his daughter was married to Pankaj Rajbanshi two years before and at the time of marriage presents and cash were given to her in-Laws.

¶16

It has been submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation of demand of dowry and torture against all the family members. It has been further submitted that the petitioner came to learn about the incident on 24.03.2016. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent

¶17

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35009 of 2018(4) dt.16-08-2018 2/2

¶18

and has been falsely implicated in this case. There is no specific allegation against the petitioner. It has been further submitted that on the date of occurrence petitioner was not at the place of occurrence but was in Hatkhola (West Bengal) to earn his livelihood and he is residing separately from the family of the deceased. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 19.02.2018.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-2nd, Gaya, in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 55 of 2016 .

¶20

(S. Kumar, J)

¶21

ranjan/-

¶22

Pradeep Rajbanshi v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pradeep Rajbanshi v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramiz Raja @ Raja Vs The State Of Bihar

Brahamdeo Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Pawan Chaudhary @ Pawan Kumar Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Vijay Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Pintu Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Lakshman Mandal @ Laxman Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar