Allowed

Pintu Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC16 Aug 2018CR. MISC./34606/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Justice S. Kumar granted bail to Pintu Kumar Singh in connection with offences under Section 414/34 IPC and Arms Act. The petitioner, in custody since December 2017, was ordered to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of similar amount to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka.

Pintu Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar — Corruption | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.34606 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-608 Year-2017 Thana- AMARPUR District- Banka

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Pintu Kumar Singh, S/O Badri Singh, Resident of village- Narainpur, Police Station- Sajour, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, Adv. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Chandrasen Prasad Singh, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 16-08-2018

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

counsel for the State.

¶14

The petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Amarpur P.S. Case No. 608 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25 (1-b)a, 26 of Arms Act.

¶15

Informant is a Police Officer, who in his written complaint has stated that one Dharmendra Kumar Singh was arrested on the basis of secret information received by him and one motorcycle and one country made pistol was recovered from his possession, on his confession police arrested the petitioner with one motorcycle but he could not produce any valid document of ownership of said motorcycle. However, except the said motorcycle nothing was recovered from the

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34606 of 2018(3) dt.16-08-2018 2/2

¶17

possession of the petitioner.

¶18

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case and except one case as stated in Para-3 in Shahkund (Sajour) P.S. Case No. 76 of 2015 under sections 448, 341, 323, 307 and 504/34 of I.P.C., no other criminal case has been instituted against the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 18.12.2017.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in connection with Amarpur P.S. Case No. 608 of 2017.

¶20

(S. Kumar, J)

¶21

Rajiv/manoj

¶22

U T

Pintu Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pintu Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramiz Raja @ Raja Vs The State Of Bihar

Brahamdeo Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Pawan Chaudhary @ Pawan Kumar Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Vijay Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Pradeep Rajbanshi Vs The State Of Bihar

Lakshman Mandal @ Laxman Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar