Allowed

Lakhpato Devi v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC10 Aug 2015CR. MISC./32526/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

On an anticipatory bail application, the Patna High Court directed the release of the petitioner, a Panchayat Mukhia, on personal bail with conditions, considering previous grants in analogous cases involving purchase of solar lights through unauthorized channels.

What did the court decide?

Released on anticipatory bail upon arrest or surrender within twelve weeks, furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. conditions.

Lakhpato Devi Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32526 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -236 Year- 2014 Thana -BIHIYA District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== 1. Lakhpato Devi Wife of Sheo Kumar Yadav, Resident of villageKateyan, P.S.- Bihiya, District- Bhojpur .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madan Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 10-08-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being Panchayat Mukhia is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 408,409,420 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶3

The accusation is of purchase of solar light by diverting the funds from other scheme and the purchase was made from the agency not authorized by BREDA or BELTRON.

¶4

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that considering the fact that solar lights were purchased from Tata B P Company which is also incorporated in the list of authorized dealers, similarly situated accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail vide Cr. Misc. No.51739 of 2014 and analogous cases and Cr. Misc. No. 13342 of 2015.

¶5

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32526 of 2015 (2) dt.10-08-2015

¶6

2/2

¶7

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of twelve weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Bihiya P.S. Case No. 236 of 2014 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶8

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶9

Anil/-

¶10

U T

Lakhpato Devi v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lakhpato Devi v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Taufique Ahmad Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Hitesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Vishnu Prasad @ Bishnu Prasad Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Chandan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Rintu Kumar @ Rintu Singh and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Babloo Hembram @ Babaniya Hembram Vs The State Of Bihar