Held that restoration of an anticipatory bail application dismissed for default after nearly four years is not inclined, and the application was disposed of with liberty to file a fresh one.
Application dismissed with liberty to file a fresh application if desired.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUR Criminal Miscellaneous No.31181 of ======================================= |
E AT PATNA 2015 =============== |
|
|---|---|---|
Vishnu Prasad @ Bishnu Prasad Versus State of Bihar & Anr .... ======================================= Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhakar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Pd.Singh |
.... .... Petitioner/s .... Opposite Party/s =============== (App) |
|
| ======================================= CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KU ORAL ORDER |
=============== MAR SINGH |
|
| 2 07- |
08-2015 The present application has been |
filed for restoration |
| of Criminal Miscellaneous No.24326 of | 2011 which was | |
| dismissed for default vide order dated 23.08.20 This court is not inclined to |
11. restore the above- |
|
| mentioned anticipatory bail application of about four years of its dismissal. Accordingly, the application is |
the petitioner after disposed of with a |
|
| liberty to the petitioner, if he so desires, application. |
may file a fresh | |
| Ashwini/- U |
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) T |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application dismissed for default after four years should be restored?
Vishnu Prasad @ Bishnu Prasad
State of Bihar
Dinesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
