Dismissed
Md. Sohrab v. the State of Bihar
Patna HCCR. MISC./8710/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 8710 of 2012
====================================================== Md. Sohrab Son of Abdul Sattar @ Abdus Sattar, Resident of Madhopara, P.S. K. Hat, Sahayak Khajanchi, District Purnea. .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abbas Haider For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4. 21-04-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner, invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, has prayed for quashing of an order dated 10-10-2011 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea (in short “Magistrate”) in K. Hat P.S. Case No. 308 of 2011. By the said order, learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of offence under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code and section 17 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1970. I do not find any defect in the impugned order. The petition stands dismissed.
(Rakesh Kumar, J.)
Anay
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order taking cognizance of the offence should be quashed under inherent powers.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Md. Sohrab
The State of Bihar
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court