The High Court allowed the petitioners liberty to surrender before the lower court within eight weeks to seek regular bail, disposing of the criminal miscellaneous petition without prejudice to the lower court's examination.
Liberty to surrender before the lower court within eight weeks and pray for regular bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 10076 of 2014
====================================================== 1. Ashok Yadav, Son of Krishna Yadav. 2. Udit Yadav, Son of Late Jagdish Yadav. 3. Prabesh Yadav, Son of Late Jagdish Yadav. All are residents of Village- Bauridih, P.S. Khudaganj, District – Nalanda. .... .... Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2. 19-04-2014 After some argument, learned counsel for petitioners, in presence of Md. Arif, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, submits that this petition may be disposed of so that petitioners may surrender before the court below and make prayer for regular bail.
The prayer is allowed.
The petition stands disposed of granting liberty, as indicated above.
If petitioners surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today and make a prayer for regular bail, the learned court below, without being prejudiced with this order, may examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law, preferably; on the same date.
(Rakesh Kumar, J.)
Anay
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the petitioners to surrender before the lower court and apply for regular bail within eight weeks.
Ashok Yadav and others
State of Bihar
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
