(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) Considering the nature of accusation, the Court was not inclined to interfere with the statutory duty of the police to investigate a cognizable offence. The application was disposed of with liberty to raise contentions later.
Application disposed of; liberty to raise contentions after investigation concludes.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.14889 of 2014
====================================================== Supan Sah .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 11-04-2014 The present application has been filed for quashing the FIR of Parsa P.S. Case No. 54 of 2013 registered for the offences punishable under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. Considering the nature of accusation, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the statutory duty of the police to investigate a cognizable offence. Accordingly the application is disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to raise all the contentions at the appropriate stage after conclusion of the investigation.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)
Amrendra/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can interfere with the police investigation into an FIR for offences punishable under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act at this stage.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Supan Sah
The State of Bihar
Dinesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
