Tuntun Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition in bail application declared infructuous as petitioner caught; disposed; no substantive legal proposition.
What the court decided
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14751 of 2014 (3) dt.24-06-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.14751 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -20 Year- 2014 Thana -KATIHAR DistrictKATIHAR ====================================================== Tuntun Yadav, son of Lal Yadav .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER 3 24-06-2014 This application has been placed under the heading “To be mentioned”. None turned up on behalf of the petitioner. As is evident from mentioning slip, solitary petitioner is apprehended by the police. Hence this application stands disposed of as having become infructuous. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, in connection with Nagar (Sahayak) P.S. Case No. 20 of 2014 through Fax at the cost of petitioner. Rajeev/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J) U T
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Tuntun Yadav
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Akhilesh Chandra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court