The Patna High Court rejected a bail application filed by Sanjay Yadav in an Arms Act case. The judge declined to liberate the petitioner despite the recovery of a pistol, dismissing the application.
Bail application dismissed; trial expedited to be concluded within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 10436 of 2014
| Arising Out of PS.Case No. -143 Year- 2013 Thana -SONBARSHA District- SAHARSHA |
|
|---|---|
| ====================================================== Sanjay Yadav Son of Ganeshi Yadav Resident of Village- Gajipaita, P.S- Sonbarsha Raj, District- Saharsha. .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== |
|
| Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. For the Opposite Party : Mr. ====================================================== |
|
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER |
|
| 6. | 21-07-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. H. A. Khan, learned A.P.P. for the State. |
| The petitioner seeks bail in Sonbarsha P.S. Case No. 143 of 2013 dated 01.10.2013 instituted under Sections 25 (1-B) (a)/26/35 of The Arms Act, 1959. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is in custody since 02.10.2013 and the recovery is of one loaded country made pistol and five cartridges. Learned A.P.P. submits that the petitioner has 19 other cases against him under grave Sections of the Indian Penal Code as well as the Arms Act. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsels for the parties, the |
|
| Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The | |
| application stands dismissed. |
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10436 of 2014 (6) dt.21-07-2014
2/2
However, the Court below shall expedite the trial and concluded the same within six months.
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)
Anand Kr.
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in a case involving possession of an unlicenced weapon under the Arms Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SANJAY YADAV
THE STATE OF BIHAR
AHSANUDDIN
AMANULLAH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
