The informant has named the petitioner, Sohrab, Jamal and Moquim having armed with double barreled gun and suit case. However, in the first information report the name of Balal also finds place. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Balal has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 34839 of 2006 and it has, further, been contended that in paragraph 152 of the case diary it has come that Balal has hurled bomb. However, while granting bail to Balal it has been taken into fact that the name of Balal finds place in the first information report, but, against Balal there is neither anything in the first information report nor anything in the case diary that Balal was seen there whereas Sohrab, the petitioner, Jamal and Moquim are alleged to have been armed with fire arms.