The Patna High Court dismissed the petitioner's application for anticipatory bail as infructuous because he had already been arrested. The matter is pending in the CJM at Madhubani.
Application regarding anticipatory bail dismissed as infructuous due to prior arrest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36093 of 2013 (2) dt.06-09-2013
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.36093 of 2013 ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
Umesh Yadav .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== |
|
| 2 | CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-09-2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that |
| petitioner has been arrested, hence, his application with regard to | |
| anticipatory bail has become infructuous. | |
| Accordingly the same is dismissed as infructuous in | |
| connection with Pandaul P.S. Case no. 50 of 2013 pending in the | |
| court of learned C.J.M., Madhubani. |
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)
Anil/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for anticipatory bail becomes infructuous upon the arrest of the petitioner.
Umesh Yadav
The State Of Bihar
Dinesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
