Allowed

Leela Devi @ Leelawati Devi v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC18 Apr 2013CR. MISC./10932/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an oral order granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner, mother-in-law of the deceased, in a case alleging offences under Sections 498A, 304B, and 201/34 IPC, subject to furnishing a bond and undertaking specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on bond of Rs.5,000 with two sureties, subject to affidavit, representation, and appearance conditions.

Leela Devi @ Leelawati Devi Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2013)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10932 of 2013 (2) dt.18-04-2013

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.10932 of 2013

¶3

====================================================== Leela Devi @ Leelawati Devi wife of Gauri Shankar Thakur, resident of village Neur Pokhar, Police Station Jagdishpur, District Bhojpur, at present residing at Basawan Tola, Police Station Piro, District Bhojpur .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Sandhya Kunwar, wife of Late Manoj Thakur, resident of village Baulipur, Police Station Jagdishpur, District Bhojpur .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Anita Kumari Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. R.B. Roy ‘Raman’, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER

¶4

2 18-04-2013 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 498A, 304B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶5

Considering that the Petitioner is the mother-in-law of the deceased and is in custody since 30.11.2012, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned First Additional District Judge, Bhojpur at Arrah in connection with Sessions Trial No.15 of 2013 arising out of Piro P.S. Case No.200 of 2012, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who

¶6

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10932 of 2013 (2) dt.18-04-2013

¶7

will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that she will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if she fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, her bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if she fails to do so on two consecutive dates, her bail will be liable to be cancelled.

¶8

(Anjana Prakash, J)

¶9

Narendra/-

Leela Devi @ Leelawati Devi v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Leela Devi @ Leelawati Devi v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mandeo Saw @ Raju Vs The State Of Bihar

Devendra Paswan @ Dewendra Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Pramod Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Uma Shankar Yadav @ Uma Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Pramod Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Subodh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar