High Court rejected the petitioner's prayer for bail in a rape-related case under the Indian Penal Code, declining to review an earlier refusal order as the trial was nearly concluded.
Prayer for bail was once again rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7024 of 2013 (4) dt.17-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.7024 of 2013
====================================================== 1. Devendra Paswan @ Dewendra Paswan S/O Yogeshwar Paswan R/O Village - Basantpur, P.S. Sakra, District - Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. D.P. Karn, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madan Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 4 17-04-2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in Sakra P.S. case No.45 of 2010 (Sessions Trial No.369 of 2011) instituted for the offence under Sections 376, 448, 341, 323 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The Petitioner was refused bail earlier by an order dated 2.9.2011. Considering the report of the Trial Court that the trial is almost concluded, I am not inclined to review the earlier order refusing bail to the petitioner.
Prayer for bail is once again rejected.
(Anjana Prakash, J)
Narendra/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner shall be granted bail when the trial is almost concluded.
Whether the earlier order refusing bail shall be reviewed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Devendra Paswan
The State Of Bihar
Anjana Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
