Petitioner sought permission to withdraw an application in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 10914 of 2013. The High Court dismissed the matter as withdrawn. No substantive legal proposition beyond the procedural disposal is found.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10914 of 2013 (2) dt.18-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.10914 of 2013
====================================================== Subodh Kumar son of Birbal Yadav, resident of village Madarichak, Police Station Makhdumpur in the district of Jehanabad .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. S. Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 2 18-04-2013 Mr. S. Kumar, learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the application. Application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Anjana Prakash, J)
Narendra/-
Subodh Kumar
The State Of Bihar
Anjana Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
