The Patna High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition filed by Naresh Yadav regarding a conviction under section 304B IPC as infructous, having found he had already been convicted for the offence in the trial court.
Petition dismissed as infructous following conviction of the petitioner by the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15079 of 2012 (3) dt.03-10-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.15079 of 2012
====================================================== Naresh Yadav .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 03/ 03.10.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. The learned trial court has reported that petitioner has already been convicted for the offence punishable under section 304B of the IPC and, therefore, in my view, this petition has become infructous. Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed being infructous. Shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)
(Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)
Naresh Yadav
The State Of Bihar
Hemant Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
