High Court of Orissa disposed of a writ petition seeking apportionment of an amount. The Court held that the dispute relates to partition pending in a civil suit, thus the petition was dismissed as the outcome of the pending suit must be awaited.
Writ petition disposed of on the observation that the matter is subjudice in a pending civil suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P (C) No. 9398 of 2014
Ratnamani Moharana @ Ojha
….. Petitioner
Mr.N.Lenka, Advocate
Vs.
….. Govt. of India & Others Opposite Parties
Mr. N.Behuria, Adv. O.P.No.5 & 6
Mr. A.Das,Adv. O.P.No.1 &2
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER 03.01.2023
Order No.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
N. Behuria, learned counsel for the Opposite Party Nos.5 & 6 and Mr. A. Das, learned counsel appearing for the Opposite Party Nos.1 and 2.
Page 1 of 2
apportionment of the amount may not be possible.
Alok/Subrat
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
(B. P. SATAPATHY)
JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition regarding apportionment of a sum can be decided without waiting for the related civil suit to conclude.
Ratnamani Moharana @ Ojha
Govt. of India
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
