The High Court of Orissa allowed the writ petition by analogy with W.P.(C) No. 12789 of 2004, noting the petitioner's legal representative had obtained compassionate appointment pending the petition.
The writ petition stands allowed in terms of the judgment in W.P.(C) No. 12789 of 2004.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No. 12791 of 2004
Laxman Kumar Gouda
….. Petitioner
Mr. B. Routray, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. S. Routray, Advocate
Vs.
Union of India & Ors.
Opposite Parties
Mr. P.K. Parhi DSGI along with Mr. B.S. Rayaguru, CGC
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE B.P. SATAPATHY
ORDER
02.01.2023
Order No.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
(B.P. SATAPATHY)
JUDGE
Alok
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition should be decided by relying on the judgment passed in W.P.(C) No. 12789 of 2004 dated 02.01.2023.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Laxman Kumar Gouda
Union of India
B.R. Sarangi
B.P. Sataphthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
