In a civil writ petition, the High Court allowed an interim application filed by the counsel for the opposite parties to rectify a typographical error in the judgment dated 02.01.2023.
Application allowed; name of Mr. M.K. Pradhan reflected in the judgment dated 02.01.2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P (C) No.12789 of 2004
Mahammed Riyaz Uddin
Petitioner
Mr. B.Routray, Sr. Advocate
Vs.
Union of India & Others
….. Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Parhi, DSGI, Mr. B.S. Rayaguru, CGC along with Mr. M.K. Pradhan, CGC (for O.Ps. No.1-4)
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE B.P. SATAPATHY
ORDER
20.01.2023
Order No.
14.
I.A. No.774 of 2023
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. This is an application filed by Mr. M.K. Pradhan learned C.G.C appearing for O.Ps No.1-4 seeking for rectification of typographical error crept in the judgment dated 02.01.2023. 3. Heard.
4. Considering the grounds taken in the application, the I.A. is allowed. The name of Mr. M.K. Pradhan, CGC be reflected in the judgment dated 02.01.2023 along with Mr. P.K. Parhi, DSGI and Mr. B.S. Rayaguru, CGC appearing for O.Ps No.1-4.
5. The I.A. is accordingly disposed of.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
(B. P. SATAPATHY) JUDGE
7.
Alok/sangita
Mahammed Riyaz Uddin
Union of India
DR. B.R. SARANGI
B.P. SATAPATHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
