The high court disposed of the original writ petition transferred from the Odisha Administrative Tribunal as the petitioner had no instruction to pursue the matter.
Disposed of for lack of up-to-date instruction; liberty granted within sixty days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC(OA) No. 409 of 2015
Semi Mahadevi Bagarty
Petitioner
Mr. Bibhudatta Biswal on behalf of Mr. M. Pratap, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & others
Opp. Parties
Mr. T.K. Praharaj, Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO
| r No. | ORDER 11.05.2022 |
|
|---|---|---|
| 01. | 1. Thi 2. Th 20thAug |
s matter is taken up through hybrid mode. e writ petition has been registered before this Court on ust, 2021, after the original application was transferred |
| from the | learned Odisha Administrative Tribunal, Principal | |
| Bench, B | hubaneswar upon its abolition. | |
| 3. On |
perusal of the available order sheets of the learned | |
| Tribunal, | it is indicated that notices were issued on 09.02.2015 | |
| and the 4. Lea up-to-dat |
matter was never taken up/pursued after 28.08.2017. rned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no e instruction on behalf of the petitioner to pursue the |
|
| matter at | present. | |
| 5. Acc to-date i the same |
ordingly, the writ petition is disposed of for lack of up- nstruction from the petitioner granting liberty to revive within sixty days for any surviving cause of action. |
Order No.
RJ
(M.S. Sahoo)
Judge
Semi Mahadevi Bagarty
State of Odisha
M.S. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
