Laxmiprasad Dansena v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WPC(OAC) No.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WPC(OAC) No. 1044 of 2014
Laxmiprasad Dansena
…. Petitioner
Mr. M.K.Swain along with
Mr. Arabind Tripathy, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & others
…. Opp.parties
Mr.T.K.Praharaj, Standing Counsel
CORAM: JUSTICE M.S.SAHOO
ORDER
Order No.
10.05.2022
02. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
“ This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
None appears for the petitioner when the matter is called.
The writ petition has been renumbered and registered before this Court on 10.12.2021 after being transferred, upon abolition of Odisha Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack.
On perusal of the available order-sheet of the learned Tribunal, it is found that the matter was never taken-up/pursued after 11.03.2015.
The petitioner-applicant was aged about 55 years of age challenging the order of retrenchment dated 03.01.2014 by the opposite party no.5Executive Engineer, Main Dam Division, Burla, Sambalpur.
The further a prayer made in the writ petition was to regularize the services of the petitioner.
Learned Standing Counsel referring to the averments made in the original application and annexures, submits that after the retrenchment had taken effect there was no question of any regularization in the service and regarding reengagement and continuation of the petitioner nothing would survive at present for adjudication.
// 2 //
Having heard the learned Standing Counsel to grant another opportunity to the petitioner, list on 10.05.2022.”
( M.S.Sahoo )
Judge
dutta
Page 2 of 2
Laxmiprasad Dansena
State of Odisha & others
M.S. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court