The High Court of Orissa disposed of a writ petition challenging the continuation of departmental proceedings affecting pensionary benefits as not pressed, since the proceedings were finalized during pendency, granting liberty for other causes of action.
Disposed as not pressed, liberty granted to file petition for any other cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC(OA) No. 367 of 2015
Bishunu Prasad Sahoo
…. Petitioner Mr. S.N.Patnaik, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and another …. Opp. Parties Mr. Rajesh Kumar Tripathy, ASC
CORAM:
JUSTICE M.S.SAHOO
ORDER
Order No.
11.5.2022
1. 1. This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.
// 2 //
(M.S.Sahoo) Judge
dutta
Page 2 of 2
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the continuation of departmental proceedings depriving pensionary benefits survives after the proceedings are finalized.
Whether the writ petition is maintainable when the underlying administrative proceeding has concluded.
Whether to grant liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition if the current one was disposed of.
Bishunu Prasad Sahoo
State of Odisha
M.S. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
