The High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous on the submission that the contentious matter had become irrelevant during its pendency.
Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC(OA) No. 402 of 2015
Pratima Pattnaik
…. Petitioner
Mr. R.K. Bisoi, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & others …. Opp. Parties
Mr. P.K. Panda, Standing Counsel (School and Mass Education Deptt.)
CORAM:
JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO
ORDER
Order No. 11.05.2022
01. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. The writ petition has been registered before this
Court on 20 th August, 2021, after the original application
was transferred from the learned Odisha Administrative
Tribunal, Principal Bench, Bhubaneswar upon its
abolition.
3. On perusal of the available order sheets of the
learned Tribunal, it is indicated that notices were issued on
06.02.2015 and the matter was never taken up/pursued
thereafter.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
during pendency of the writ petition, the matter has been
rendered infructuous.
RJ
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as
infructuous.
(M.S. Sahoo) Judge
// 2 //
Page 2 of 2
Pratima Pattnaik
State of Odisha
M.S. SAHOO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
