In W.P.(C) No. 20832 of 2012, the Court disposed of the petition as infructuous, holding that the dispute regarding the 2012 election was rendered stale due to the efflux of time.
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No. 20832 of 2012
Heard Mr. S. Nayak, learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State.
Perused the record. Since the dispute relates to election held in the year 2012, by efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as infructuous.
.…………….……………….
(DR. B.R. SARANGI, J)
Ajaya
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition has become infructuous by the efflux of time due to the election being held in 2012.
What is the disposition of the writ petition?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Unknown Petitioner
State
DR. B.R. Sanging
DR. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
