Disposed
Kartik Ch. Das v. Dr. Krishan Kumar
Orissa HCCONTC/80/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
This matter is taken up through video…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTC No.80 of 2021
Mr. Jagdish Biswal, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the name of Mr. Bansidhar Baug, learned counsel be deleted from the cause list.
Accordingly, the name of Mr. Bansidhar Baug is deleted.
Heard Mr. J. Biswal, learned counsel for the petitioner.
It is stated that the order dated 14.08.2020 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.17476 of 2020 has not yet been complied with.
Let the opposite party comply with the same, if not complied with in the meantime, within a period of three months from the date of production of certified/authenticated copy of this order by the petitioner. Contempt petition is disposed of accordingly.
…………….……………….. (DR. B.R. SARANGI, J)
Ajaya
Attorney General / Petitioner
Opposite Party
B. R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court