The court disposed of the writ petition by relying on the reasons stated in a prior, related judgment (Dhiren Kumar Pradhan) from which the issue analogy was drawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 12587 of 2012
Gokulananda Mohapatra
….. Petitioner Mr. G.K. Mohanty, Advocate
Vs.
Bhubaneswar Municipal ….. Opposite parties Corporation and others Mr. M. Mohapatra, Sr. Adv.
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
12.08.2021
Order No.
This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.
05
It is agreed by learned counsel for the parties that
the issue involved in this case is analogous to one involved
in W.P.(C) No. 12405 of 2010 ( Dhiren Kumar Pradhan v.
State of Odisha and others ), which has been disposed of
on 24.01.2019.
Therefore, in view of the reasons stated in the
detailed order dated 24.01.2019 passed in W.P.(C) No.
12405 of 2010 ( Dhiren Kumar Pradhan v. State of
Odisha and others ), this writ petition stands disposed of
in terms of the said order.
Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
Ashok
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Dhiren Kumar Pradhan v. State of Odisha and othersReferred¶14
W.P.(C) No. 12405 of 2010 (Dhiren Kumar Pradhan v. State of Odisha and others)
Gokulananda Mohapatra
Bhubaneswar Municipal Corporation
DR. B.R. SARANGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
DR. B.R. SARANGI
Parties & counsel
