From the impugned order dated 21.08.2020 vide Annexure-9, it appears the claim of the petitioner pending for Rehabilitation Assistance Appointment pending since 2013 involving a death of the year 2013 to be considered applying the 2020 rules, a rule which has not seen the light of the day either on the date of death of the deceased or on the date of application or even at the time of consideration of the recommendation of the case of the petitioner. For the settled position of law through the decision in the case of Canara Bank Vrs. M. Mahesh Kumar , reported in 2015 (7) SCC 412, the latest decision of the Hon’ble apex Court, through the decision in the case of Indian Bank and others Vrs. Promila and another , reported in 2020 (2) SCC 729 and several decisions of this Court particularly involving W.P.(C) Nos.8486 of 2021 and 10571 of 2021, it is observed law on this score has been settled and there remains no doubt while considering the case of Rehabilitation Assistance Appointment, the rule prevailing at the time of death has the relevancy. For the operation of Rule, 1990, the Amendment Rule, 2016 at the relevant point of time there is no possibility of application of OCS (RA) Rules, 2020 to the case at hand. In this
