Nabakishore Naik v. Mahanadi Coal Fields
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK OJC No. 7132…
What did the court decide?
writ petition dismissed for want of instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
OJC No. 7132 of 1999
Naba Kishore Naik
….. Petitioner
Mr. B.R. Barik, Advocate
Vs.
Mahanadi Coal Field Limited and ….. Opposite parties
others
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
12.08.2021
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 10. Mr. B.R. Barik, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has no instructions in the matter, as the brief has already been transferred from his office.
Ashok
In such view of the matter, the writ petition stands
dismissed for want of instructions.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
Naba Kishore Naik
Mahanadi Coal Field Limited
DR. B.R. SARANGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court