Miss Madhumita Jena v. Controller of Exam.
Case brief
What is this about?
Heard Mr. S.K. Rout, learned counsel for the…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTC No. 180 of 2014
1
Since it is an year old case of the year 2014, by efflux of time, the contempt application merits no consideration. Accordingly, the same is disposed of.
.……………………..…..
Ajaya
Dr. B.R. Sarangi, J
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court