Kabi Ranjan Nayak v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
None appears for the petitioner at the time…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRLMP No. 1619 of 2016
1
Mr. P. Mohapatra, learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State is present.
Perused the record. The petitioner has filed this application seeking for a direction to opposite party no.2 to take electronic recording stated under Annexures-5 and 6 as document in evidence in Pattamundai P.S. Case No. 404 of 2016.
Mr. P. Mohapatra, learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State submits that if the petitioner wants to take his statements electronic evidence, he has to approach the appropriate forum. Pursuant to FIR lodged investigation has been conducted and charge sheet has been submitted on 31.01.2018.
In such view of the matter, the relief sought having been granted, the CRLMP stands disposed of.
.……………………..… Dr. B.R. Sarangi, J
Ajaya
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court