This single-paragraph order dismisses an application for anticipatory bail, observing that the gravity of the alleged offence precludes release. No detailed reasoning or statutory analysis is provided in the text.
The application for anticipatory bail was dismissed. The petitioner was not released on bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ABLAPL No. 14136 of 2017
1
03 16.11.2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned State counsel, and also perused the case diary.
Considering the nature and gravity of offence alleged against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to release the petitioners on anticipatory bail. The ABLAPL stands dismissed.
………………………… …
Dr. B.R. Sarangi, J.
Alok
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to release on anticipatory bail given the gravity of the alleged offence?
Petitioner
State
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
