Ambuja K. Rout v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Learned counsel for the petitioner states…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No. 5454 of 2006
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner does not want to press this application and may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition. A memo with the same prayer has also been filed, which is taken on record.
In such view of the matter, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
…………….…………… (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Ashok
DR. B.R. SARANGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court