allotment of particular area, the shop rooms have also been constructed in a manner to keep the area away from pollution hazards and traffic congestion as well. Further to avoid the traffic congestion in the locality and looking to the pleadings of the opposite party No.2 as well as the State Authorities and further looking to the photographs presented in Court by the opposite party No.2, this Court is of the view that the present place of accommodation for the traders will be definitely a better accommodation than the earlier one. Further since the traders are mere licensees and the decision has been taken not only in their interest but also in the larger interest of the local public. Keeping in view the traffic congestion as well as the public inconvenience from the environment point of view, petitioners having no right, cannot set conditions in the matter of setting up of market complex. Since all the petitioners are to be accommodated in the new place of shifting, they cannot have any objection in this regard, as their trade will verymuch continue. Looking to the observations made by the Permanent Lok Adalat, this Court finds taking into consideration the allegations made in the PLA Case No.16/11, 19/11 & 131/11, the Presiding Officer, Permanent Lok Adalat, Ganjam, Berhampur taking into consideration several issues and suggestions given from different corners arrived at a terms of settlement under Section 22-C(7) of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 and the terms settled therein reads as follows:
