Sitaram Panda v. State of Orissa
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition seeking directions for the prompt release of pension and consequential retirement benefits. The court directed the opposite party to consider the petitioner's representation and pass an order within three months without deciding the merits.
What did the court decide?
Direction to opposite party to consider representation in Annexure-4 and pass appropriate order within three months.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P. (C) No. 22290 of 2015
08.01.2016
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
The petitioner files this application seeking for a direction to the opposite parties t
o promptitude steps for release of pension and other consequential retirement benefits in his
favour within a stipulated time.
In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that highlighting the
grievance, the petitioner has made representation before the opposite party no.1 vide Annexure
s-4 and direction may be given to consider the same within a stipulated time.
In view of the aforesaid limited grievance of the petitioner, without expressing any op
inion on the merits of the case, this Court disposes of the writ petition directing opposite p
arty no.1 to consider and dispose of the representation in Annexure-4 and pass appropriate ord
er within a period of three months from the date of communication of this order.
Requisites for communication of this order to opposite party no.1 shall be filed withi
n a week.
Issue urgent copy as per Rules.
Ashok
Dr. B. R. Sarangi, J.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the opposite party to consider the petitioner's representation regarding the release of pension and retirement benefits within a stipulated time.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
Opposite Party No. 1
Coram
Dr. B. R. Sarangi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court