This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OJC No. 1658 of 1991
19.08.2016 Heard Mr. S.S. Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Nayak, learned counsel
for opposite parties.
Mr. S.S. Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of the wri
t petition the relief sought for in the writ application has already been sorted out amongst t
he parties.
In that view of the matter, the writ application stands disposed of.
Dr. B.R. Sarangi, J.
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court