Disposed
Susama v. State
Orissa HCOJC/15083/1997
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 1997 02.08.2016 Heard Mr. B. Das, learned…
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
¶1
OJC No. 15083 of 1997
02.08.2016
¶2
Heard Mr. B. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B.P. Pradhan, learned Add
¶3
l. Government Advocate.
The petitioner files this application seeking to quash the appointment order pursuant
to the selection made in the year 1997.
While entertaining this application, this Court has not passed any interim order and a
s such, in the meantime, 19 years have elapsed. With the efflux of time, the writ application
has become infructuous, accordingly, the same stands disposed of as infructuous.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the writ application seeking quashing of an appointment order from 1997 remains maintainable after 19 years of delay.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
Government
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court