Prasanta Dandasena v. State of Orissa
Orissa HCBLAPL/5096/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2015 19.04.2016 Heard learned counsel for…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
BLAPL No.5096 of 2015
¶2
19.04.2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner is in custody as an accused in S.T. Case No.219 of 2014 on the file of l
earned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Sambalpur registered under Section 354-A/354-B/376-D/
506/323/341/109/34/120-B, I.P.C. read with Sections 4, 6 and 14 of the POSCO Act and Section
66-E/67-A/67-B of the I.T. Act.
¶3
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that one co-accused has already been releas
ed on bail. But it is seen from the record that the present petitioner along with another are
alleged to be the principal accused persons.
Considering the alleged nature of offence, I am not inclined to grant the benefit of ba
il to the petitioner. Accordingly, the bail application stands rejected.
Since it is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the trial of the case has progre
ssed substantially, learned trial court would do well to dispose of the case as expeditiously
as possible preferably within a period of three months.
¶4
J.P. Das, J.
¶5
2
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
State of Odisha
- respondent
Wahab Koya
- respondent
Anis Koya
- respondent
Mohammad Iqbal Koya
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court