This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ABLAPL No.6235 of 2015
20.07.2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the Vigilance Departme
nt.
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the only material available during inv
estigation is that one vehicle stood registered in the name of petitioner no.1 and that the pe
titioner no.2 has not been named in the F.I.R.
Learned counsel for the Vigilance Department submits that none of the petitioners has be
en named in the F.I.R. and no case has been instituted against them.
Considering the circumstances, the present bail application of the petitioners has becom
e infructuous. Accordingly, the ABLAPL is dismissed as infructuous.
J.P. Das, J
2
Petitioners
Vigilance Department
J.P. Das
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court