Dismissed¶37

M/s.Robust Business Ventures LLP v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC12 Jun 2026WP Crl./473/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Police protection mandamus dismissed; WP Crl. 473/2026 Madras High Court; boundary compound wall construction; Sholavaram Police Station Thiruvallur; respondents 2-8 claiming assignors, alleged trespass; sale deed 04.03.2021; ex parte injunction O.S.No.68 of 2024 decree 30.07.2025; District Collector Thiruvallur proceedings 02.02.2026; lands classified 'Government Anatheenam'; house site patta action pending; Article 226; no costs.

What did the court decide?

The District Collector, Thiruvallur, is taking appropriate action to secure the house site patta in respect of the subject lands. ¶36

M/s.Robust Business Ventures LLP Vs The Inspector of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Dismissed

¶37

Issue for consideration

Whether the first respondent (Inspector of Police, E-5 Sholavaram Police Station) must provide sufficient and effective police protection to the petitioner firm, its authorised representatives, employees, labourers and contractors, from respondents 2 to 8 and their men, associates or agents, based on the petitioner's representation dated 02.01.2026. +1 more

¶25

Court's answer

The prayer sought for in the petition cannot be granted; the Writ Petition is devoid of merits and stands dismissed, with no costs.

¶37

Ratio / Principle

The District Collector, Thiruvallur, is taking appropriate action to secure the house site patta in respect of the subject lands.

¶36

Key takeaways

The petitioner had obtained an ex parte injunction order against the respondents by showing the patta and sale deed.ratio¶36

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Writ Petition (Criminal) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a mandamus directing the Inspector of Police, E-5 Sholavaram Police Station, to provide police protection to M/s.Robust Business Ventures LLP, its representatives, employees, labourers and contractors against respondents 2 to 8, for construction of a boundary compound wall, based on the petitioner's representation dated 02.01.2026 — DISMISSED. The petitioner claimed three acres (Survey Nos.94/3E2 part, 94/3E3 part, 94/3E4 Part) by sale deed dated 04.03.2021 and held an ex parte permanent injunction decree dated 30.07.2025 in O.S.No.68 of 2024 against respondents 2 to 8, who claim assignor rights and allegedly attempted trespass. The Government Advocate submitted that the District Collector, Thiruvallur, by proceedings dated 02.02.2026, classified the lands as 'Government Anatheenam'. Holding that the Collector was taking appropriate action to secure house site patta and that the petitioner had already obtained an ex parte injunction by showing the patta and sale deed, the Court found the prayer ungrantable, dismissed the petition as devoid of merits, and made no order as to costs. (G.K. Ilanthiraiyan, J.; 12-06-2026)

¶1

WP Crl. No. 473 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 12-06-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

WP Crl. No. 473 of 2026

¶7

M/s.Robust Business Ventures LLP Rep.by its Authorized Representative, C.Subodh Kumar, S/o.Late.Chhotelal Ram, Having their registered office at No.43, Medavakkam Tank Road, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010.

¶8

..Petitioner(s)

¶9

¶10

The Inspector of Police E-5, Sholavaram Police Station, Sothuperumbedu, Thiruvallur District-600 067.

¶11

Chiranjeevi

¶12

Kala

¶13

Jayamalani

¶14

Venkatesh Reddy

¶15

Jothi

¶16

Mahendran

¶17

8. Giri Babu

¶18

..Respondent(s)

¶19

Prayer: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent provide sufficient and effective police protection to the petitioner firm, its authorised representatives, employees, labourers and contractors, from the respondents 2 to 8 and their men, associates, or agents. This protection is needed for the peaceful and uninterrupted construction of the boundary compound wall around our property as per our representation dated 02.01.2026.

¶20

For Petitioner(s): Mr.Ramesh Kumar Chopra For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar for R1 Counsel for Government of Tamilnadu (Crl.Side)

¶21

Page1 of 6

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

WP Crl. No. 473 of 2026

¶24

ORDER

¶25

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the 1^st respondent to provide sufficient and effective police protection to the petitioner firm, its authorised representatives, employees, labourers and contractors, from the respondents 2 to 8 and their men, associates, or agents based on the representation dated 02.01.2026.

¶26

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the 1^st respondent and perused the entire documents placed on record.

¶27

According to the petitioner-Company, the petitioner claim to be the owner of the property comprised in Survey no.94/3E2 part measuring to an extent of one acre, property comprised in Survey No.94/3E3 part, measuring to an extent of one acre and property comprised in Survey no.94/3E4 Part, measuring one acre, in total, to an extent of three acres by way of sale deed dated 04.03.2021. While being so, the respondents 2 to 8 herein are also claiming to be assignors in respect of the suit property, attempted to tresspass into the property, therefore, the petitioner filed O.S.No.68 of 2024 for permanent injunction and obtained Judgment and decree dated 30.07.2025 against the respondents.

¶28

Page2 of 6

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

WP Crl. No. 473 of 2026

¶31

The learned Government Advocate [Crl.Side] appearing for the 1^st

¶32

respondent would submit that the subject lands were already assigned in favour of the respondents 2 to 8 herein. Already, this issue has been taken cognizance by the District Collector, Thiruvallur and by his proceedings dated 02.02.2026, the subject lands have been classified as ‘Government Anatheenam’. The following observation was also made by the District Collector, Thiruvallur:-

¶33

__________ Page3 of 6

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

WP Crl. No. 473 of 2026

¶36

Thus, it is clear that District Collector, Thiruvallur, is taking appropriate action to secure the house site patta, that apart, the petitioner obtained exparte injunction order as against the respondents by showing the patta and sale deed.

¶37

In view of the above, the prayer sought for in this petition cannot be granted and the present Writ Petition is devoid of merits and the same stands dismissed. No costs.

¶38

12-06-2026

¶39

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No ssd

¶40

__________ Page4 of 6

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

WP Crl. No. 473 of 2026

¶43

¶44