Vineeta Vijayakumar Vs The State Rep.by, The Assistant Commissioner of Police

¶1

WP Crl. No. 550 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 11-06-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

WP Crl. No. 550 of 2026

¶7

Vineeta Vijayakumar D/o. Vijayakumar Periasamy, Amalfi 3203, House of Hiranandini, 5/63, OMR Road, Egattur, Thiruporur Taluk, Chengalpet District - 603 103.

¶8

..Petitioner

¶9

Vs

¶10

The State Rep.by, The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Kelambakkam Range, Kanathur - 603 112.

¶11

The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Kelambakkam Range, Kanathur - 603 112.

¶12

Bharti Airtel Limited, No.42/147 & 44/146, Santhome Road & Rosary Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004.

¶13

Mahesh Balakrishnan

¶14

(R4 impleaded as respondent vide order dated 11.06.2026 made in WPMP Crl.No.444 of 2026 in W.P.Crl.No.550 of 2026)

¶15

..Respondents

¶16

__________ Page1 of 5

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

WP Crl. No. 550 of 2026

¶19

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 14.11.2025 and direct the respondents 1 and 2 to issue the Call Detail Records (CDR) of Mr.Mahesh Balakrishnan’s Mobile No.9677223181 from March 2024 to the current dated from the concerned service provider viz., the 3^rd respondent and pass such further or other orders.

¶20

For Petitioner: Mr. J.Chandran Sundar Sashikumar For Respondents: Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) for R1 & R2 Mr.P.J.Rishikesh for R3 Mrs.K.Sumathi for R4

¶21

ORDER

¶22

This Writ Petition (Criminal) has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 14.11.2025, seeking call detail records of Mahesh Balakrishnan’s Mobile No.9677223181 from the month of March 2024 till the current date from the third respondent.

¶23

Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the

¶24

materials available on record.

¶25

There is a dispute between the petitioner and her husband viz.,

¶26

Mahesh Balakrishnan. Due to the said dispute, the petitioner lodged several complaints alleging various allegations. In one such complaint, a case was

¶27

Page2 of 5

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

WP Crl. No. 550 of 2026

¶30

registered by the second respondent in Crime No.290 of 2025. Now, the entire investigation has been completed and the final report was filed. The same has been taken cognizance in C.C.No.108 of 2026 on the file of the Judicial

¶31

Magistrate, Thiruporur and it is pending for trial. In the meanwhile, the petitioner submitted a representation seeking call detail records of her husband, viz., Mahesh Balakrishnan, to establish the allegations made against him in Crime No.290 of 2025. However, the second respondent has already completed the investigation and filed the final report, which has been taken cognizance by the Trial Court. Therefore, the request made by the petitioner seeking the call detail records cannot be accepted and the same cannot be forwarded without following the due process of law.

¶32

In view of the above, the representation submitted by the petitioner cannot be considered. Thus, the writ petition lacks merit and is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, this Writ Petition (Criminal) stands dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to workout her remedy before the Family Court, if so advised. It is also brought to the notice of this Court that the Guardian Wards Original Petition is pending before the Family Court. No costs.

¶33

11-06-2026 )2/2(

¶34

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No LPP

¶35

__________ Page3 of 5

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

WP Crl. No. 550 of 2026

¶38

To