M/s G.a.Fragrance v. N.Sumesh
Case brief
What is this about?
The judge examined a draft plaint and affidavit regarding alleged trademark infringement, finding the cause of action arose partly within the court's jurisdiction, and granted leave to sue while directing the registry to number the suit.
What did the court decide?
Leave to sue the respondent granted; Registry directed to number the suit.
What the court decided
A.No.780 of 2022
A.No.780 of 2022 in C.S.DR.No.16609 of 2022
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J
This application is filed for leave to sue the respondent before this Court. The applicant states that the cause of action for the suit arose within the jurisdiction of this Court since the respondent is selling products bearing the infringing mark within the jurisdiction of this Court.
- Upon examining the draft plaint and the affidavit in support of the application, I find that the cause of action has arisen at least partly within the jurisdiction of this Court. Accordingly, A.No.780 of 2022 is allowed by granting leave to the applicant to sue the respondent before this Court. Consequently, the Registry is directed to number the suit, if it is otherwise in order.
04.03.2022
rna
A.No.780 of 2022
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether leave to sue should be granted for infringement of intellectual property rights where cause of action arises within the court's jurisdiction
Whether the registry should be directed to number the suit upon granting leave
Parties & counsel
- applicant
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
Coram
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court