The court allowed an application for leave to file additional documents, subject to objections by plaintiffs regarding relevance and proof, and permitted a statement of admission or denial.
Leave granted to file documents mentioned in schedule subject to plaintiffs' objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.789 of 2022 in C.S.(Comm. Div)No.46 of 2021
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J
A.No.789 of 2022 is filed by the second and fourth defendants in
the suit. By this application, the applicants seek leave to file the documents mentioned in the schedule to the judge's summons.
by considering the submissions of the plaintiffs, this application is allowed subject to objections of the plaintiffs, inter alia , with regard to relevance and proof. The plaintiffs are permitted to file a statement of admission/denial in respect of the additional documents.
03.03.2022
kal
(½)
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ______________ Page No.1 of 2_
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J
kal
A.No.789 of 2022 in C.S.(Comm. Div)No.46 of 2021
03.03.2022 (½)
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ______________ Page No.2 of 2_
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ______________ Page No.3 of 2_
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to file additional documents should be granted subject to objections on relevance and proof.
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
