Allowed the applicant's application for leave to file a suit pending before this Court, granting jurisdiction based on cause of action arising partly within the territory.
Leave to sue the respondent before this Court was granted; Registry directed to number the suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.229 of 2022
A.No.229 of 2022 in C.S.DR.No.117066 of 2021
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J
Upon failure of the pre institution mediation process, this application for leave to sue is listed today. The applicant states that the cause of action has arisen substantially within the jurisdiction of this Court because the applicant / plaintiff made payments to the defendant from Chennai. In addition, it is stated that critical documents pertaining to the suit claim were received at Chennai.
draft plaint and the affidavit in support of the application, the cause of action for this suit has arisen at least partly within the jurisdiction of this Court. Consequently, A.No.229 of 2022 is allowed by granting leave to
the applicant to sue the respondent before this Court. As a corollary, the Registry is directed to number the suit, if it is otherwise in order.
04.03.2022
rna
A.No.229 of 2022
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J
rna
A.No.229 of 2022 in C.S.DR.No.117066 of 2021
04.03.2022
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to sue should be granted to the applicant.
Applicant / Plaintiff
Respondent
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
