The Single Judge allowed an application for leave to institute a civil suit, finding that the cause of action arose partly within the court's jurisdiction and directing the registry to number the suit if in order.
Leave to institute suit granted; registry directed to number the suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.1904 of 2021
A.No.1904 of 2021 in C.S.DR.No.40940 of 2021
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J
This application is filed for leave to institute the suit against the respondent before this Court. The applicant states that the respondent availed of financial assistance from the applicant at Chennai. In addition, it is stated that the statement of accounts by which liability was admitted was executed at Chennai.
04.03.2022
rna
A.No.1904 of 2021
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J
rna
A.No.1904 of 2021 in C.S.DR.No.40940 of 2021
04.03.2022
2 issues framed by the court
Whether leave to institute the suit against the respondent before this Court should be granted under article 227 of the Constitution.
Whether the cause of action for the suit has arisen within the jurisdiction of this Court.
APPLICANT
RESPONDENT
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
